3
$\begingroup$

There are three formulae for the Roche limit distance. They are all simple, but the second one doesn't require knowing the densities, just the ratio of their masses and the size of the neutron star.

$d= R_m(2$${M_M}\over{M_ m}$$)^{1/3}$

where $R$ is the radius of the neutron star, $M_M$ is the mass of the black hole, and $M_m$ is the mass of the star.

If the mass ratio is a billion, and the neutron star radius is 5 miles, the formula says that a neutron star could orbit a black hole until its surface was 1,260 miles above the event horizon.

Right?

So if a neutron star orbits lower than this, the tidal force will tear it apart even though its surface gravity is 200 million Gs.

Is this correct?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

Wrong. It means the "distance" between the centre of the black hole and the Roche breakup limit is 1260 miles.

Since the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole is of order 2 miles per solar mass, neutron stars are about 1.5 solar masses and you assumed $M_M/M_m \sim 10^9$, then the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole is billions of miles.

The neutron star will hardly notice crossing the event horizon; the tidal forces are negligible there. It is not until it (inevitably) gets much closer to the singularity that it breaks up.

Notes for the pedantic:

I put "distance" in quotes because the radial coordinate in Schwarzschild spacetime is not a Euclidean distance; it is a circumference divided by $2\pi$.

According to any external observer, the neutron star cannot pass through the event horizon. It will simply redshift and disappear (without breaking up).

There is no stable orbit within 3 Schwarzschild radii of a non-spinning black hole.

The quoted formulae uses Newtonian physics, but by a quirk of nature this turns out to be approximately correct for a free-falling body in General Relativity.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ This is true in Euclidean spacetime. But I have a hard time seeing how anything could pass through the event horizon when all of the mass of the black hole is distributed as the surface of the horizon. === I think I remember a theory-model that says the horizon IS the singularity The interior doesn't exist. There is no spacetime inside a black hole. $\endgroup$ Commented yesterday
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MissUnderstands you have to choose your observer. Of course the neutron star cannot pass through the event horizon according to any external observer. The formula you have quoted is derived using Euclidean geometry and Newtonian physics. It is an approximation. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    Commented yesterday
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MissUnderstands You may be thinking of the fuzzball model under string theory. But that model is not a mainstream accepted model, it's just a hypothesis. $\endgroup$ Commented 12 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ @Shufflepants The fuzzball model was interesting, but that's not it. ==== I thought everybody knew / believed that the mass of a black hole existed on its event horizon. I guess not. $\endgroup$ Commented 3 hours ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.